LSFmod vs LimitedSharpenFaster — When to choose each
Overview
- LimitedSharpenFaster (LSF): original, fast, simple edge-focused sharpener (Unsharp/range-style).
- LSFmod: LaTo’s mod of LSF with many extra features (nonlinear modes, preblur, source limiting, temporal soothe, presets, better control over overshoot/undershoot), generally produces fewer artefacts and better compressibility but is slightly slower.
Choose LimitedSharpenFaster when
- You need the simplest, fastest sharpen for quick preview or live playback.
- You want minimal configuration and lightweight processing.
- You prefer classic LSF behaviour and compatibility with old scripts/tools.
Choose LSFmod when
- You want finer control: nonlinear sharpening, Smode/Smethod options, Szrp/Spwr/Sdmp parameters.
- You need to avoid noise/ringing (preblur, secure) or limit sharpening against an unsharpened source.
- You care about temporal stability (soothe/keep) or advanced edge masking and overshoot/undershoot control.
- You aim for better encode size/quality tradeoffs and fewer artefacts (recommended for final encodes).
Practical defaults
- For fast final encodes: use LSFmod(defaults=“fast”) with moderate strength (e.g., 100–150).
- For minimal processing / realtime: use LimitedSharpenFaster(strength=…) or LSFmod with very simple Smode settings if available.
Caveats
- High strength values (>150–200) often produce visible artifacts on large displays—test at target viewing size.
- LSFmod requires additional plugins (MaskTools2, RemoveGrain/RGTools, VariableBlur/WarpSharp depending on Smode).
- VapourSynth/Avisynth implementations and defaults may differ; check your environment’s version.
Sources: Avisynth LSFmod documentation, community discussions and comparisons.
Leave a Reply